2025 begins a new era in the American Government. New departments, slashing jobs and reducing costs for the common citizen. The U.S. Government remitted an estimated $247 billion in improper payments in FY 2022.
Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been tasked with basically restructuring much of the government; removing regulations to reduce expenditures and increasing government efficiency. Specifically targeting waste, fraud and abuse. At least, that's the intention.
Some of the incredible programs that taxpayer dollars are currently funding include: You've heard of facial recognition software, well the government has spent $6.9M studying “smart toilets” that can recognize an individuals...pucker print. $2.3M have been spent on injecting dogs with cocaine. $7M of your money was spent on studying “magic”. Washington D.C. will spend $2.6M to train Chinese prostitutes to drink more responsibly on the job. The NIH alone has spent $760M on 'diversity, equity and inclusion'. These and nearly 6000 other pork barrel programs have been or are currently being funded. This is one of the reasons our taxes are so high and still growing. Did you know the U.S. gives out more foreign aid than the next 9 countries combined?
So far, the DOGE has identified and helped eliminate 104 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) related government contracts across 30 federal bodies totaling about $1B in savings, thanks to Trump’s January 20th Executive Order.
In recent years, the discussion surrounding DEI has gained significant traction across various sectors in the United States. DEI initiatives aimed to foster a more inclusive environment for individuals from diverse backgrounds, but critics argue that these ideologies may inadvertently lead to division and resentment. DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, three interrelated concepts that allegedly aim to create an environment where all individuals feel valued and respected, regardless of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or social status.
Diversity refers to the presence of differences within a given setting, equity concerns fairness in processes and access to opportunities, and inclusion involves creating spaces where everyone can participate and contribute. Organizations, educational institutions, and government entities have increasingly adopted DEI initiatives, emphasizing their commitment to social justice and equality. However, the implementation of these initiatives has sparked heated debates about their effectiveness and consequences.
Proponents of DEI argue that these efforts are necessary to address systemic inequalities that have persisted in American society for generations. By promoting diversity, organizations can allegedly benefit from a wider range of perspectives and ideas, ultimately leading to enhanced problem-solving and innovation.
Despite the claimed benefits, critics argue that DEI ideology can lead to unintended consequences. One major concern is the emphasis on identity politics, which some believe fosters division rather than unity. By focusing on individuals' racial, gender, or other identities, critics argue that DEI initiatives can perpetuate a sense of "us versus them," ultimately undermining the entire goal.
Additionally, the implementation of DEI initiatives results in tokenism, where individuals from marginalized backgrounds are included for the sake of appearances rather than genuine commitment to DEI. This can lead to resentment among employees who feel that meritocracy is being sacrificed for the sake of diversity.
Moreover, there is growing concern about the potential backlash against DEI initiatives. As some individuals feel marginalized or overlooked in the pursuit of equity, tensions may rise, leading to conflict within organizations and communities. This creates an environment of distrust, where individuals are pitted against each other based on their identity rather than their shared goals.
The impact of DEI ideology is particularly pronounced in educational institutions. Many universities have implemented DEI training programs aimed at indoctrinating students and staff about perceived systemic inequalities. However, these programs promote a narrow worldview or stifle open discourse. DEI training is ideological indoctrination, where dissenting opinions are marginalized or silenced. This has raised concerns about academic freedom and the ability of students to engage in robust discussions about controversial topics.